Showing posts with label MetaBirkins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MetaBirkins. Show all posts

Saturday, May 3, 2025

NFT Art Copyright Disputes – The Clash Between Digital Art and the Law

NFT Art Copyright Disputes – The Clash Between Digital Art and the Law

Are NFTs the future of digital assets or a hotbed of copyright disputes? A heated debate is unfolding, confusing both creators and buyers alike.


NFT Art Copyright Disputes – The Clash Between Digital Art and the Law

Hello! I'm someone with a deep interest in digital content and law, and one of the hottest issues I've been following lately is the copyright disputes in NFT art. Artists who mint their own artwork as NFTs end up being sued, while third parties turn famous pieces into NFTs without consent. These situations severely impact both the protection of creator rights and the credibility of the NFT market. Today, I’d like to walk you through some major cases of NFT copyright disputes and explore what direction digital copyright should take in this new era.

1. What is NFT Art?

NFT art refers to digital artworks assigned a unique ‘token’ through blockchain technology. This token acts as a non-fungible digital certificate, used to verify the ‘ownership’ of a specific image, video, or 3D file.

However, this ownership is distinctly different from copyright. NFT buyers can trade the token, but do not automatically receive the rights to modify the original work or use it commercially. This distinction lies at the heart of many copyright disputes.

2. The MetaBirkins Case: Clash with a Luxury Brand

One of the most well-known cases of NFT copyright dispute is the “MetaBirkins” incident. Digital artist Mason Rothschild released an NFT series parodying Hermès’ iconic “Birkin” bags. In response, Hermès filed a trademark infringement lawsuit.

Item Details
Artwork Name MetaBirkins (NFT series)
Complainant Hermès
Core Issue Trademark infringement, brand confusion, freedom of art vs. commercial use
2023 Ruling Hermès won, awarded approximately $130,000 in damages

This ruling set a key precedent that even if NFT artworks are considered artistic expression, they can still face legal consequences for trademark infringement.

3. Unauthorized Minting: NFTs Issued Without the Creator’s Consent

On NFT platforms, it is common for third parties to illegally mint someone else’s artwork, photos, or music and sell them. In fact, OpenSea revealed that about 80% of transactions in 2021–2022 involved plagiarized content.

  • Minting screenshots of Twitter or Instagram images without the artist’s permission
  • Even AI-generated images are being turned into NFTs, further confusing creators
  • Even if a takedown is requested, tracking already-traded NFTs is nearly impossible

Because NFTs are immutable, recovering from copyright infringement becomes incredibly difficult. This is a prime example of the current gap between technology and legal systems.

4. The Legal Void in Current Copyright Law

NFT technology is evolving rapidly, but current copyright laws do not adequately reflect the digital asset and blockchain environment. Specifically, there is a lack of legal standards regarding the scope of rights between NFT issuers and original creators, platform responsibilities, and automated minting systems.

As a result, NFTs can be easily altered and traded as illegal copies, and even when victims raise objections, it’s difficult to achieve actual deletion or compensation under the current system.

5. Efforts to Protect Creator Rights

In response, various global efforts are being made to protect creators. NFT platforms are beginning to implement copyright verification systems and shift toward creator-centric contract structures.

Protection Effort Description
Original Verification Before NFT Minting Pre-verification through creator account authentication and original image hash matching
Copyright Holder Rewards Automatically pays a percentage of secondary NFT sales to the original creator
Illegal Mint Detection Solutions AI-based image similarity detection and automatic takedown request functionality

As the NFT market becomes increasingly global, governments and international organizations are beginning to revise copyright norms. In the near future, blockchain-based copyright registration systems, smart contract-based licensing frameworks, and standardized dispute resolution systems across platforms are likely to emerge.

  • WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) has initiated discussions on international NFT copyright agreements
  • EU: Strengthening platform accountability via the Digital Services Act (DSA)
  • Countries like South Korea, the U.S., and Japan are conducting blockchain copyright pilot projects
  • Community-driven “NFT Copyright Certification DAOs” are also emerging

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

QDo you own the copyright when you buy an NFT?

No. Purchasing an NFT gives you digital ownership, but copyright typically remains with the original creator. Commercial use requires a separate license agreement.

QWhy did the court rule in favor of Hermès in the MetaBirkins case?

Because even if the NFT is art, it cannot legally infringe on trademarks or cause consumer confusion.

QCan anyone mint NFTs?

Technically, yes. But if you mint someone else's work without permission, you could face copyright infringement liability.

QCan stolen NFTs be deleted?

Platforms can delete listings, but the blockchain record remains permanent. So practical removal is difficult.

QWhat are NFT platforms doing to protect copyrights?

Some platforms are adopting creator authentication before minting, AI-based detection for illegal minting, and creator royalty systems, though standards are not yet unified.

QWill NFT copyright disputes increase or decrease?

They are likely to increase in the short term, as laws and systems lag behind rapid technological growth. But with global standards, stability may improve over time.

The Limits of Freedom and Rights in Digital Creation: How Far Can NFTs Go?

NFTs are an innovation that has opened new doors in the digital art market, but they also expose blind spots in law and policy. The current structure—where copyright and ownership are traded without clear distinction—can be risky for both creators and buyers. As we chase the pace of technological innovation, we must also consider the ethics and legal frameworks that support it. I hope this post helped broaden your perspective on the intersection of art and law in the NFT era.

The Doll War of the Century – Barbie vs Bratz, The Story of the Design Lawsuit

The Doll War of the Century – Barbie vs Bratz, The Story of the Design Lawsuit A former designer’s idea turns into a multi-billion dollar...